Archive

Archive for October, 2008

Presidential Elimination Game

October 29th, 2008 No comments

You guys know how it works…take one away from the one you dont like, add one to the one you do..last one standing wins…

George Washington 10
John Adams 10
Thomas Jefferson 10
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 10 ( 1) = 11
Martin Van Buren 10
William Henry Harrison 10
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklen Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 10 (-1) = 9
Andrew Johnson 10
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
Grover Cleveland 10
William McKinley 10
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodraw Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 10
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 10
John F. Kennedy 10
Lyndon B. Johnson 10
Richard M. Nixon 10
Gerald R. Ford 10
.Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 10
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 10
George W. Bush 10

bump because this game will be awesome

It's gonna be a boring evening! Fixed some spellings and removed double of Cleveland. So here goes:

George Washington 10
John Adams 10 1 = 11
Thomas Jefferson 10
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 11
Martin Van Buren 10
William Henry Harrison 10
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 9
Andrew Johnson 10 – 1 = 9
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 10
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 10
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 10
John F. Kennedy 10
Lyndon B. Johnson 10
Richard M. Nixon 10
Gerald R. Ford 10
.Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 10
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 10
George W. Bush 10

Pi/0=3

Because you can't disprove it with a calculator.

George Washington 10
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 10
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 11 1=12
Martin Van Buren 10
William Henry Harrison 10
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 9
Andrew Johnson 9
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 10
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 10
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 10
John F. Kennedy 10
Lyndon B. Johnson 10
Richard M. Nixon 10
Gerald R. Ford 10
.Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 10
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 10
George W. Bush 10-1=9

George Washington 10 1=11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 10
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 12
Martin Van Buren 10
William Henry Harrison 10
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 9-1=8
Andrew Johnson 9
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 10
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 10
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 10
John F. Kennedy 10
Lyndon B. Johnson 10
Richard M. Nixon 10
Gerald R. Ford 10
.Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 10
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 10
George W. Bush 9

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 10
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 12
Martin Van Buren 10
William Henry Harrison 11 ( 1)
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 9
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9 (-1)
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 10
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 10
John F. Kennedy 10
Lyndon B. Johnson 10
Richard M. Nixon 10
Gerald R. Ford 10
.Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 10
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 10
George W. Bush 9

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 10
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 12
Martin Van Buren 11 ( 1)
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 9
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 11
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 10
John F. Kennedy 10
Lyndon B. Johnson 10
Richard M. Nixon 10
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 10
George W. Bush 8 (-1)

I dont like him. Read the objective statement from the game again

its not about best vs worst…its about like vs dont like.

Or that he is just a crappy president…

what happened to you today, man. You ok?

Just a shoulder injury. Should know more tomorrow… I'll be back next week for sure though

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 10
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 12
Martin Van Buren 11
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 9
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 12 ( 1)
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 10
John F. Kennedy 10
Lyndon B. Johnson 10
Richard M. Nixon 9 (-1)
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 10
George W. Bush 8

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 11
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 11 (-1)
Martin Van Buren 11
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 8
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 12
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 10
John F. Kennedy 11
Lyndon B. Johnson 10
Richard M. Nixon 9
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 11 ( 1)
George W. Bush 7

You're from Tennessee, and you took a point away from Lincoln. Aren't you late for the klan meeting?

I'm actually related to the Adams'.

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 11
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 11
Martin Van Buren 11
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 8
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 12
Harry S. Truman 10
Dwight D. Eisenhower 11 ( 1)
John F. Kennedy 11
Lyndon B. Johnson 9 (-1)
Richard M. Nixon 9
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 11
George W. Bush 7

I like it how you all bash Bush, but no one bashes LBJ or even Kennedy for helping to cause Vietnam. I like it how no one bashes Madison for the war of 1812.

Chuck Norris CAN divide by zero! (Yes I know this has nothing to do with the game!)

I definitely agree with the once per day rule.

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 12 ( 1)
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 11
Martin Van Buren 11
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 8
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 12
Harry S. Truman 9
Dwight D. Eisenhower 11
John F. Kennedy 11
Lyndon B. Johnson 9
Richard M. Nixon 9
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 11
George W. Bush 7

Why would we bash Madison for 1812? A major part of it was British disrespect for US sovereignty. Though we were partially at fault. And I blame Truman for Vietnam.

Yes to only voting 1 time per day.

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 12
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 11
Martin Van Buren 11
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 8
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 12
Harry S. Truman 9
Dwight D. Eisenhower 11
John F. Kennedy 11
Lyndon B. Johnson 9
Richard M. Nixon 9
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 12 ( 1)
George W. Bush 6 (-1)

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 12
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 10 (-1)
Martin Van Buren 11
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 8
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 12
Harry S. Truman 9
Dwight D. Eisenhower 11
John F. Kennedy 11
Lyndon B. Johnson 9
Richard M. Nixon 9
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 13 ( 1)
George W. Bush 6

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 12
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 11
Martin Van Buren 11
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 8
Andrew Johnson 7 (-1)
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 12
Harry S. Truman 9
Dwight D. Eisenhower 11
John F. Kennedy 11
Lyndon B. Johnson 9
Richard M. Nixon 9
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 13
George W. Bush 6 ( 1)

George Washington 11
John Adams 11
Thomas Jefferson 12
James Madison 10
James Monroe 10
John Quincy Adams 10
Andrew Jackson 11
Martin Van Buren 11
William Henry Harrison 11
John Tyler 10
James K. Polk 10
Zachary Taylor 10
Millard Fillmore 10
Franklin Pierce 10
James Buchanan 10
Abraham Lincoln 9 ( 1)
Andrew Johnson 7
Gen. Ulysses S. Grant 10
Rutherford B. Hayes 10
James A. Garfield 10
Chester A. Arthur 10
Grover Cleveland 10
Benjamin Harrison 10
William McKinley 9
Theodore Roosevelt 10
William Howard 10
Woodrow Wilson 10
Warren G. Harding 10
Calvin Coolidge 10
Herbert Hoover 10
Franklin D. Roosevelt 12
Harry S. Truman 9
Dwight D. Eisenhower 11
John F. Kennedy 11
Lyndon B. Johnson 8 (-1)
Richard M. Nixon 9
Gerald R. Ford 10
Jimmy Carter 10
Ronald Reagan 9
George Bush 10
Bill Clinton 13
George W. Bush 6

Categories: Life Tags:

Abortion is wrong, and its not an issue of choice.

October 29th, 2008 No comments

Abortion is wrong, period. It is murder, and it always has been and it always will be. Liberals try to turn it into a huge issue about choice, when it shouldn't be viewed like that at all. People can't do LOTS of things to their body. They can't legally sell their bodies, they can't kill themselves, they can't pump their bodies full of drugs, etc. You can legally abort your own child, but not other people's. If you kill your own child before it comes out of your uterus, it's not a person, but if you kill someone else's child before it comes out of their uterus, it is a person and you are charged with murder. This blatantly shows that according to the law, a woman decides whether or not her fetus, specifically, is human or not. Giving this right to women is not a right that they inherently deserve, choosing whether or not a fetus is a person or not. If you dont want a child, its very simple: DON'T GET PREGNANT. Yes, accidents happen…..ADOPTION. You say adoption isn't ok because the mother still has to go through 9 months of pregnancy and forms attachments to the baby. Okay….so you're that selfish that you can't put up with 9 months of morning sickness to allow that child to live a full life? If the attachments that you form with the baby are so strong, then why is that a bad thing, that will just make you WANT to keep the baby and love it. If you can't financially support a child, then take advantage of the many government handouts that our government just so willingly gives to everyone, even people who dont deserve them. There is not a single argument that can actually make a case for abortion if you actually look at the facts of fetal development, and seriously examine the moral implications of both cases (abortion vs. not having an abortion). Abortions are still legal during the first two trimesters. The fetus is completely done forming by the end of the first trimester. The body is shaped, the heart is beating, the brain is functioning, they have their own fingerprints, they ahve their own sex organs already (yup its already a boy or girl). Do not tell me that is not a person. If a fetus is not a person, when does it become a person that deserves the right to life? Is it a fetus the second its still in the mother, and a human one second later when it comes out? There is not one single point where you can say, ok now its not a human, now it is. Fetal formation is a long, continual process, with new human characteristics being added on to the fetus every day, and most of them completed by the end of the first trimester. The heart of your child starts beating 3 WEEKS after conception. That is about when most women even find out their pregnant. How are you seriously going to argue with me that just because it doesnt look like you or me completely yet, it's not alive, even though it has a beating heart. What about every animal on this planet, or people with disabilities that cause them to look different or have a sub-par intellect….Are they not humans? This is not an issue of a women's right to "choose" (choose WHAT)…..it is a clear cut case of murder/ don't murder.

A fetus is as alive as my sperm, NOT constantly procreating takes away potential lives.

Bodily domain. It's already a law.

chriogenically frozen embryos are also alive….false!

Oh, and people may not legally be able to sell their bodies (except in Nevada), kill themselves, or pump themselves full of drugs; but those are all hypocritical laws and people still do it anyway; just like people will still get abortions regardless of whatever law you push for.

Pushing against abortion won't win you anything, people will still get abortions, and if anti-abortion laws are passed then you won't have anyone to fight – unless you stake out doctors performing illegal surgeries and the women getting illegal abortions.

If you want to keep fighting like an asshole, it's in your best interest to let abortion be legal.

I like my fetus's rare.

ok hypothetical situation: 8 year old girl gets raped, ends up getting pregnant. if she has the baby, it is GOING to kill her because her body is not prepared to go through that stress. are you saying the "life" of this unborn fishy thing is more important than the girl who's already alive? who gets more rights here, the fetus or the person who's already living in this world and contributing to society?

actaully it depends on what you consider life as….? heart beat, blood flow, brain action,

you are incredilby arrogant.
What if the woman will die if she has the baby then what

"Only a Sith deals in absolutes."

US among worst in world for infant death

n 2004, the most recent year for which statistics are available, roughly seven babies died for every 1,000 live births before reaching their first birthday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says. That was down from about 26 in 1960.

Babies born to black mothers died at two and a half times the rate of those born to white mothers, according to the CDC figures.

The United States ranks near the bottom for infant survival rates among modernized nations.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071110/ap_on_he_me/saving_the_smallest_us_picture;_ylt=Aivg6dUQjxSlEsviI8ajxNKs0NUE

I did not say anywhere in my post that I value the rights of the fetus over the rights of the mother. They are BOTH people. Obviously the safety and welfare of the girl should not be abandoned to looka fter those of the fetus. Cases like that should obviously be taken ona case by case basis, to take the course of action that ends int he least possible amount of hurt and/or death

"They can't legally sell their bodies, they can't kill themselves, they can't pump their bodies full of drugs, etc"

you should be able to.

Oh I'm sorry, ARE YOU the one who has to carry the child for 9 months, and suffer from one week of ovulation and a bleeding vagina every month since puberty ? No, NO you're not. So for your information buddy, it is the woman's choice of having an abortion or not because it IS her body, and her right to do what she wants with it. If you say that the egg and sperm are part of life, then wouldn't you say that masturbation is ALSO wrong, because you're wasting sperm away? No, no you would not say that, because you're too busy jacking off in your comfy little chair to your computer. And what is this "just simply don't get pregnant ?". It is pretty much 90 % of the time that the men refuse to wear condoms, oh right, there are women condoms, but really ? Wouldn't it be more effective to get the men to wear condoms, or better yet, stop being pervs ? Don't ever, EVER give me this crap of how it's the woman's fault for aborting the child and blah blah blah. Because really, is it that bad to have fewer people on this planet, to have fewer babies to live on this so called planet with jackasses like yourself ? How dare you criticize what a woman can or can not do with her body ! If the mother cannot support the child, or that she feels that the child should not be born, then yes, yes she has the right to abort the child. It is her body, and no, this is not a giant selfish act, because seriously, you may think that you're saving a life, but you may be ruining 2 people's life, the mom and the kid. Have you thought about that ? No, of course not, because you're too busy sitting in your chair arguing over a problem that doesn't concern you. You're not the one who has to deal with pregnancy for 9 months, no, what the hell makes you think you know what being pregnant is and how horrible it is to worry about having a kid or not ! It is not a case of murder because the fetus is inside of the woman's stomache, it's part of her !
And it is her decision to deal with it. Since when the government can step into people's decision about their bodies ? Honestly, if pregnancy is murder then the government should ban people from masturbating, because according to this, it is a murder to waste sperm, and ovulation is murder too because women are just wasting their eggs away. Is that what you want ? Is that really what you want ? Why don't you concentrate on your little hate about abortion to more real concerns like children whom haven't eaten for a week in third real countries ? Those are the real problems, not abortions.

my goal in life (as a future lawyer) is to subvert the ideals that people like you stand for.

/thread (for me anyway)

thats what i asked. i don't mean to sound like a crazed feminist but why does this guy think he can dictate an issue that chiefly involves women? sure sure the "daddy" has rights too but its not like his insides get sucked out by what is essentially the equivalent of a parasite over the course of 9 months.

Oh dear Jesus I am not evenr eading your post past the aprt where you try to argue that men have no idea what their talking about. Please. if it wasn't for men, you wouldn't ahve the "right" to murder your innocent child. The supreme court that legalized aboriton was all men. In EVERY SINGLE national poll or survey taken on the issue, women oppose abortion at much higher rates than men. So if you want to keep abortion legal, shut the hell up about "Only a woman truly understand and should have a say". That argument is shit.

You may not know this, but the legal argument for Roe vs Wade is that the doctor should be able to provide every viable choice to the patient. FYI: I'm pro choice, and that has a lot to do with my belief that a woman should be allowed to decide what she wants to do with her body..

death is inevitable. there are worse things then death, like life long suffering.

so you're saying that in some cases abortion would be the answer? i mean maybe thats not what your saying I'm just asking.

"In EVERY SINGLE national poll or survey taken on the issue, women oppose abortion at much higher rates than men. "

Source?

I am not arrogant. Im arguing for the rights of the child, that is why I didn't mention the OBVIOUS right to life and health and safety of the mother. I never said she doesnt get that. Im arguing that the fetus is just as much a person as the mother, and therefore they BOTH deserve those rights. Try to actually point out things that you disgree with that I wrote, and not argue about things that you imagined I argued.

"They can't legally sell their bodies, they can't kill themselves, they can't pump their bodies full of drugs, etc."

Let's look at how well legislation works:
Over one million Americans have prostituted themselves at one point in their lives. That's a whole 1%.
In 2004, suicide was the eleventh greatest killer in the US. That doesn't take into consideration the 8 to 25 attempts for every success.
In 2001, a reported 41.7% of Americans admitted to illicit drug use.

It's illegal to do a lot of stuff that happens all the time. Banning immoral practices does one thing: it makes them go underground, where they're less safe and completely out of control.

So sure.
Let's prohibit something that humans have been doing since the dawn of time. (don't believe me? Search 'herbal abortificants' and check out what mid-wives have known for centuries.)
Let's force desperate women into back alleys with coat hangers and shady 'surgeons'.
Let's over-load an already over-burdened adoption system.
Let's bring in more infants for adoption when thousands of INDISPUTABLE children in foster care are shuffled from home to home, completely overlooked, underestimated, and unsupported until the day that they're spewed out into a system that can't support them.
Let's pump up violent crime with unwanted and unsupported children.
Let's throw infants in dumpsters, down toilets, in alleys to freeze.

Have fun in your pro-life Utopia where everyone is gifted with 20/20 forethought and the self-control of a saint. I don't know where you envision yourself, but I know I wouldn't survive.

i am pro choice: i believe in a human's right to do what they want with their body. but please consider that men ought to at least be able to give input. we're half the species. its half our baby.

i'm also pro-being allowed to be pro-life if you're a male

I'm just gonna say what I've been saying in all the other "abortion" threads:

Coathanger.

In a care where abortion could save a mother's life what would you do? Insist she give birth because the fetus has the same rights as the mother?

"Why did my mommy put me into care?"

"Well, Mommy got raped by a bad man when she was 13 and didnt want to abort you because a jackass on the internet said abortion is ALWAYS wrong, so instead you got put into care with no real love so you will spend your entire life fucked up wondering who your parents are."

Abortion isnt always wrong, I personally believe Abortion is a bad thing, and shouldnt be abused by anyone who decides they dont want kids, but in rare cases such as rape, genetic defects that will be passed down, or simply not being able to raise the child properly for certain reasons (I.E, Single parenthood, poverty.. ect ect.).

look everyone knows abortion is horrible. its really sad, and it usually ruins the life of the mother or deeply affects her. no one WANTS to kill their baby or potential baby or whatever. its just not in human nature. but the fact of the matter is sometimes its necessary, and the only answer. for that reason, you can't make an absolute law making it illegal. you just can't. you can think its wrong or whatever you want. hell i think its pretty aweful myself. but that doesn't mean it should be illegal

I did not say that you were talking about the mother first., that was just a question that I asked for myself.
Okay but what if the mother will die if the fetus is born? then who wins the survival I know that you said both deserve the rights, but only one can, so who?

Don't get hostile or cocky with me.

Categories: Life Tags:

Believers in God: give us your evidence for there being a god

October 29th, 2008 No comments

Now, I'm not saying I don't believe in god. But, I'm not going to say that I do either. I'm taking the neutral position here…I just want to see your evidence.

ill save you the trouble of actually asking religious b-tards (the b is for bible)

the bible and jesus is all their evidence.

some boring fiction book written a long time ago, personally i liked harry potter better, it has a more engaging plot.

hokay, so, heres my response to this. i do believe in God and i know he is there watching over me. and here is my proof:
- some supreme being had to create the very world we live in
– go ahead and bring out the big bang or evolution or what not but nothing backs those two up for which they came from. something had to cause either of them. something cant just happen, it has to have a source. p.s. what kind of explosion can create?

- how can everything be so perfect without a higher being? the way we, ourselves work, is so complex that we have to be created by God, if you will.

- for the people who think we evolved from a single-celled organism…..gee wiz. referring to the first reason, where did that organism come from? i guess it evolved from, well, i dont know, and thats my point.

and im done talking, well typing. thats not my only proof but i wana hear some cool arguments and stuff.

So…you completely believe in creationism, no evolution?

I don't really think it's a debate. The point of faith is you don't have evidence. But that doesn't mean I care if other people are religious! I'm not really religious myself: I just believe in God. It's a personal decision.

Nope, pure debate.
God vs. No God.
I layed the law down.
Debate.

Haha, touche

=P

look at the earth and say there is no G-d…..you have problems

Cant prove God exists
Cant prove God doesnt exist
Debate Over

yes i do believe in the idea of "creationism" that God created everything. i have a hard time believing we evolved.

Law of conservation of energy. Energy/matter can't be created or destroyed. How did the universe come about if it was not created by God, who by His very nature isn't bound by the laws of physics.

"- go ahead and bring out the big bang or evolution or what not but nothing backs those two up for which they came from. something had to cause either of them. something cant just happen, it has to have a source. p.s. what kind of explosion can create?"

okay, and where did God come from? He just can't happen. There had to be a source. :-D

well, i like the use of the word touche…its a pretty cool word. and for whoever said they respected my belief, i forgot ur name and dont rly feel like goin back a losing it, thank you. i also do respect ur non-belief of creationism. again, i dont agree with it but its ur choice…so its cool.

The spiritual confirmation I received when I asked Him if He existed. It's not physical evidence, but it's all the evidence I need.

yeah, i'm personally an athiest.
however, maybe god just hasn't revealed himself to me.
until then, however, i can't say i have the faith to believe in him.

There is none.

There is, however, substantial evidence for the existence of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. I mean, how else could such a perfect dish have been invented? Clearly there had to be some divine noodly intervention.

at some point there had to be a beginning of some gas or energy that created the beginning of everything, who created that? God is real

science can take the creation of time down to a thousandth of a second, BUT they can't say what actually STARTED IT ALL. there had to be something to start it and then science can tell u from a thousandth of a second after God created the earth. therefore there is a God. Nowadays Roman Catholicisim respects the thoughts of science and evolution but truly believes in God, the one that gave the world that spark to start.

OMG it's a non sequitor!

was there rly a need for the smiley Holly? lol its cool tho. ok, from what I know and believe, its that God is the beginning. there was never a beginning for him, just him. i cant provide proof for you for that though…sry. its just what i believe.

Categories: Life Tags:

HEY! GOD DOES EXIST? this your last chance you doubters

October 29th, 2008 No comments

In the beginning, God gave His law to mankind as a means of attaining happiness and eternal life. Satan's only hope of thwarting the purpose of God is to lead men and women to disobey this law, and his constant effort has been to misrepresent its teachings and belittle its importance. His master stroke has been an attempt to change the law itself, so as to lead men to violate its precepts while professing to obey it. One writer has likened the attempt to change the law of God to an ancient mischievous practice of turning in a wrong direction a signpost erected at an important junction where two roads met. The perplexity and hardship which this practice often caused was great.

Through Moses the Lord instructed the Israelites: "Verily My Sabbaths ye shall keep: for it is a sign between Me and you throughout your generations; that ye may know that I am the Lord that doth sanctify you. Ye shall keep the Sabbath therefore; for it is holy unto you: everyone that defileth it shall surely be put to death: for whosoever doeth any work. . . in the Sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death. Wherefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations, for a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel forever: for in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day He rested, and was refreshed." Exodus 31:13-17.

In these words the Lord clearly defined obedience as the way to the City of God; but the man of sin has changed the signpost, making it point in the wrong direction. He has set up a false sabbath and has caused men and women to think that by resting on it they were obeying the command of the Creator. God has declared that the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord. When "the heavens and the earth were finished," He exalted this day as a memorial of His creative work. Resting on the seventh day "from all His work which He had made," "God blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it." Genesis 2:1-3. At the restoration of Jerusalem, in the days of Nehemiah, Sabbathbreaking was met with the stern inquiry, "Did not your fathers thus, and did not our God bring all this evil upon us, and upon this city? yet ye bring more wrath upon Israel by profaning the Sabbath." Nehemiah 13:18.

Christ, during His earthly ministry, emphasized the binding claims of the Sabbath; in all His teaching He showed reverence for the institution He Himself had given. In His days the Sabbath had become so perverted that its observance reflected the character of selfish and arbitrary men rather than the character of God. Christ set aside the false teaching by which those who claimed to know God had misrepresented Him. Although followed with merciless hostility by the rabbis, He did not even appear to conform to their requirements, but went straight forward keeping the Sabbath according to the law of God.

In unmistakable language He testified to His regard for the law of Jehovah. "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets," He said; "I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven." Matthew 5:17-19.

During the Christian dispensation, the great enemy of man's happiness has made the Sabbath of the fourth commandment an object of special attack.

PLEASE JOIN THIS GROUP .. http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=25589585112

that's too fucking long. No matter, it won't change my position. God isn't real, I don't believe in him blah blah you know the rest.

god is a shitstick

tl;dr

Yup, God did stuff, Jesus did stuff, everyone goes to hell for one reason or another. Good story. Peace.

about as adorable as Scrappy Doo

"Satan's only hope of thwarting the purpose of God is to lead men and women to disobey this law, and his constant effort has been to misrepresent its teachings and belittle its importance. His master stroke has been an attempt to change the law itself, so as to lead men to violate its precepts while professing to obey it."

If God is omnipotent, how can Satan corrupt God's Word without his consent?

Yeah, Seriously, what does he expect "OH THANK YOU TERRENCE! I HAVE SEEN THE LIGHT!" Like we havnt heard this same old crap over and over before? I don't understand people.

satan is just an anthropomorphism of man's own greed and desires.

if this shit is true than god is weak man. plus your name is terrence. i've never trusted a terrence before.

clapton is god

I can accept that, but I don't think most Christians would accept it, even though it makes a lot of sense.

Because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be. So then, those who are in the flesh cannot please God. ROMANS 8:7-8

Such a conclusion is wholly uncalled for. The Bible record is in harmony with itself and with the teaching of nature. Of the first day employed in the work of creation is given the record, "The evening and the morning were the first day." Genesis 1:5. And the same in substance is said of each of the first six days of creation week. Each of these periods Inspiration declares to have been a day consisting of evening and morning, like every other day since that time. In regard to the work of creation itself the divine testimony is, "He spake, and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast." Psalm 33:9. With Him who could thus call into existence unnumbered worlds, how long a time would be required for the evolution of the earth from chaos? In order to account for His works, must we do violence to His word?

You will soon know He is not when the trumpet sounds and the King of Kings appears in glory

It is true that remains found in the earth testify to the existence of men, animals, and plants much larger than any now known. These are regarded as proving the existence of vegetable and animal life prior to the time of the Mosaic record. But concerning these things Bible history furnishes ample explanation. Before the Flood the development of vegetable and animal life was immeasurably superior to that which has since been known. At the Flood the surface of the earth was broken up, marked changes took place, and in the re-formation of the earth's crust were preserved many evidences of the life previously existing. The vast forests buried in the earth at the time of the Flood, and since changed to coal, form the extensive coal fields, and yield the supplies of oil that minister to our comfort and convenience today. These things, as they are brought to light, are so many witnesses mutely testifying to the truth of the word of God.

When consideration is given to man's opportunities for research; how brief his life; how limited his sphere of action; how restricted his vision; how frequent and how great the errors in his conclusions, especially as concerns the events thought to antedate Bible history; how often the supposed deductions of science are revised or cast aside; with what readiness the assumed period of the earth's development is from time to time increased or diminished by millions of years; and how the theories advanced by different scientists conflict with one another, –considering all this, shall we, for the privilege of tracing our descent from germs and mollusks and apes, consent to cast away that statement of Holy Writ, so grand in its simplicity, "God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him"? Genesis 1:27. Shall we reject that genealogical record,–prouder than any treasured in the courts of kings,–"which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God"? Luke 3:38.

Hey

The conflict of the ages is satans claimes that God's law is difficult and ipossible to obey. He deceives the ungaurded mind and leads his victims to sin. For sin is defined as the transgression of God's law.

Satan is real and he deceives you to think he is not

Seriously Terrence, you hater of life. Thinking that you're going to get everything that you didn't get in life upon your death. That suddenly everything that you would normally have to work on and put forth effort to attain here in this existence, you will suddenly get upon your death because you pray to the right god at the right time. You are as arrogant as you are backwards. Do you realize what we are to the near infinite planets, stars, and matter in the universe? Have you ever had the balls to look up the mathematic probability of Earth's existance versus the known universe? But you go ahead and think that the Earth was created less then 10k years ago. While you're at it, go ahead and believe it's the center of the universe and that it's flat. Keep believing what you will, and refuse to accept that maybe the only reason you believe the way you do is because of fear and insecurity. You coward.

Again, if God is all-powerful and all-knowing, how could Satan commit this deception without God's consent? Being all-knowing, God would know when Satan was trying to deceive people, and being all-powerful, he would have the ability to stop Satan. If he did NOT stop Satan from deceiving people, then he must have allowed it to happen.

But the power of God is still exercised in upholding the objects of His creation. It is not because the mechanism once set in motion continues to act by its own inherent energy that the pulse beats, and breath follows breath. Every breath, every pulsation of the heart, is an evidence of the care of Him in whom we live and move and have our being. From the smallest insect to man, every living creature is daily dependent upon His providence.

God is just, pure and holy. He gives all His creatures the free will to choose which law to obey. But He will bring every deed and word spoken into judgement and the wicked shall be destroyed from the face of the earth.

There will be no more sin and no more death in God's new earth. The advocates of the stupid idea of evolution will be no more and the world will be peaceful forever and ever.

The same power that upholds nature, is working also in man. The same great laws that guide alike the star and the atom control human life. The laws that govern the heart's action, regulating the flow of the current of life to the body, are the laws of the mighty Intelligence that has the jurisdiction of the soul. From Him all life proceeds. Only in harmony with Him can be found its true sphere of action. For all the objects of His creation the condition is the same–a life sustained by receiving the life of God, a life exercised in harmony with the Creator's will. To transgress His law, physical, mental, or moral, is to place one's self out of harmony with the universe, to introduce discord, anarchy, ruin.

Upon all created things is seen the impress of the Deity. Nature testifies of God. The susceptible mind, brought in contact with the miracle and mystery of the universe, cannot but recognize the working of infinite power. Not by its own inherent energy does the earth produce its bounties, and year by year continue its motion around the sun. An unseen hand guides the planets in their circuit of the heavens. A mysterious life pervades all nature–a life that sustains the unnumbered worlds throughout immensity, that lives in the insect atom which floats in the summer breeze, that wings the flight of the swallow and feeds the young ravens which cry, that brings the bud to blossom and the flower to fruit.

lol…
$1 000 000 says terrence doesnt have a GF….

Categories: Life Tags:

CHRISTIANITY IS A LIE!

October 29th, 2008 No comments

Jesus was not the son of god. Look up the Jesus Seminar or various books on the subject. PBS also did a piece called "From Jesus to Christ."

Here are a few sites:

http://www.geocities.com/wwu777us/Debunking_Christian_Arguments.htm

http://home.ca.inter.net/~oblio/CTVExcerptsIntro.htm

http://home.ca.inter.net/~oblio/home.htm

enjoy

//Jesus was not the son of god//

Prove it=you cant
Prove he is=I can't

discussion over.

Yes, it can. It has. Look up the things i cited. Discussion commence, if you have any brains or balls.

Jesus was either a lunatic, a liar or our Lord- C.S Lewis

watch a case for christianity by lee strobel on youtube.

or, never existed in the first place

ok after reading like 2 minutes of the "debunking" of the first link you posted, i thought it was incredibly stupid. and most of its arguments, i could disprove, and im 15 years old, so thats kind of sad. as for the other 2 links, i havent read them over yet, but give me time.

One of the sites that i cited refutes lee strobel's case for christ. Try looking at the things i cite before replying. I know verifying information before making up your mind is not a primary characteristic of yours since you are religious, but come on.

:) i love C.S. Lewis

a liar yes.

well actually, he was a real person, just not the son of god or anything like that

Alex…you cited sources you believe. There are sources that cite otherwise. Grow up, get a life.

"I know verifying information before making up your mind is not a primary characteristic of yours since you are religious"
…umm… steriotype much?

you are a dumbass who says there is no way when there is and it has. look at the original post and check the things i mentioned and the sites i posted. Raptor Jesus, cant you shmucks look things up before responding?

You might be able to prove that he was not scientifically the son of God (like if you did a DNA test or something) but that is suggesting that Christianity is science.

"There is no possible way to confirm or deny the existence of one person 2000 years ago."

I think Julius Caesar lived about 2000 years ago.

Are you going to dispute that?

did you? no. Am i correct? yes. Are you a sophist? yes.

Maybe he was a real person. I see no reason to believe he was, though.

Alex, if this is what you believe, why did you feel the need to even bring it up?

Those links don't prove that Christianity is false anymore than the Bible proves it is true. You are merely putting your faith in those articles and the men who wrote them just as Christians have their faith in God and the men who wrote the Bible. Its no different, just different ideas.

Why do you care anyway? Get molested in a church or something?

a bunch of historic evidence and stuff…

Caesar was an emperor. Historic documents prove he existed. The only reference to Jesus existing is the bible, which isn't credible.

Burned by Catherine

there isnt just believe and disbelieve. There is a wealth of information available from historians of the time period jesus is said to have existed that do not mention him once…and for someone who was going around performing miracles and rising from the dead, you think he would be mentioned somewhere, but no.

There is information out there that says some science fiction character created us, which is unfalsifiable and hence stupid.

Any information that is unfalsifiable allows for any possibility and dissolves into idiocy.

Im right here guys.

Christians are ruining the world. But to be fair, there are some other religious people that suck too. Though most muslims are peaceful people, but since there are over 1 billion of them, even 1% being extremist is a lot of people ready to go nuts.

Alex, you're a retard. Shut up.

What does it matter if he was real or not If someone believes in something like Jesus thats fine, if someone doesn't believe thats fine too. People believe in religion and god(s) because they feel they need something to believe in. Its a choice you make, yes some religions force their beliefs on you by door to door knocking or sermans on live tv but you do have a choice. It's not a case of real or fake, it's a case of if you want to believe then go right ahead. How ignorant are you to even think you can change the minds of about 3.5 billion people across the globe by posting this ridiculous thread. More than half of the worlds populace believes in some kind of religion. Whether Jesus was real or not, people believe in him and that brings them piece of mind so fuck off pal. You're just as bad as that dumbass raciSt Plexico who posted the thread "why are white people racit" Grow up will you.

For the record, there is historical evidence that shows that Mohammad existed.

Categories: Life Tags:

Pro-Choice or Pro-Life?

October 29th, 2008 No comments

jest askin'…. (saw this in seinfeld once)

PRO LIFE

ABORTION IS MURDER

Pro-choice.

Against abstinences only sex education.

Making abortions illegal will only make SAFE abortions illegal.

And now, everyone, if you look below me, there is a nice flame-war…

never mind, the flaming began above me…

Let me ask you, when does life begin?

If it begins at conception, shouldn't every conceived zygote get a social security number?

pro-choice

liberal 2 the extremeeeeeeee

choice.

abortion clinics or bathroom trashcans?

every time you masturbate you're aborting tons of little babies.

if someone is raped and impregnated they shouldn't be forced to go through labor if they don't want to.

I don't think that this is a liberal/conservative dichotomy.

The FACT of the matter is that if abortions are criminalized, the only thing that will be illegal are SAFE abortions. More girls will die, more will be ostracized from their families and more people will be born to parents unable or unwilling to raise them.

You cannot be pro-life AND anti-zombie!

Seriously, though…

I am pro-destruction-of-the-human-race.

Seriously? Pro-choice.

Pro life

im with you on that one.

hey can anyone tell me why most (not all) of the pro-life people also support the war in Iraq? do they not understand what happens in war? please tell me because its fucking with my mind

god i hate it being called pro-life

how bout anti-choice

anti-abortion

WE WANT LIFE, WE ARE SO RIGHTEOUS. YOU FOOLS ARE AGAINST LIFE

GREATER THAN THOU

conservatives are basically for death [besides abortion]

war, guns, prisons [gang violence in prisons]

I always thought the whole life begins at conception thing is pretty stupid.

A fucking single cell organism can be classified as life, your liver cells can be classified as life, grass is living, that ant you just squished was living, that burger you ate was once a living thing .. meh.

*Edit: I'm not a vegan, just trying to make a point.

pro-choice. listen, if you dont want an abortion, dont have one. obviously it shouldnt be used as a birth control method but if there is something seriously wrong or if the woman was raped she shouldnt be forced to keep the child as long as its before a certain point.

no, we can't have that. the conservative christians tell it like it is and everyone must fall under their umbrella of righteousness. fuck your beliefs.

I'll say this, you're an idiot if you don't know you don't whether or not to abort by the end of the first trimester.

birth control method? last time i checked it was expensive, painful, and good for only one time. i'd rather be on the pill

Pro-Choice

strange that it is only MEN answering here….
why exactly do male (politicans specifically) have a say in what I do with my uterus?

Same reason they can tell you to wear a seat belt.

so is your face

and anthony you're right, anyone who says it is used as birth control obviously has never had one

What?

I said you should have a choice… excuuuuse me

or will ever have to for that matter

no i know im not disagreeing with you
i'm just saying in politics it is ususally old men who are against it… and it pisses me off because they will in NO WAY ever benefit from legal adoptions and will never even have a chance to experience what it is like to have to choose

and my adoptions i meant abortions (obv)

To quote Maddox,

" I'm against abortion, but for killing babies. That way everyone loses, and I win. I'm neither pro choice, nor pro life; I'm pro you-shutting-the-hell-up. The only way I'd be "pro choice" is if it meant I could choose which babies I could abort, and only then if I could lift the age restriction to 80. I was at this mall the other day watching some shitty documentary when I came out of the theater and saw old people dancing to country music in the courtyard. I couldn't remember the last time I saw a group of people begging this hard to be aborted."

I most certainly concur.

i know. thats why they are crazy bastards. it hurts my head trying to think like an evangelical christian

pro-choice. get those little fuckers lol.

Haha, remember the pizza episode?

"It's not a pizza until it comes out of the oven!"

"It's a pizza the moment you put your fists in the dough!"

lol

Categories: Life Tags:

Someone give me real non-circular proof god doesnt exist(Calling all Agbostics and or Atheists)

October 29th, 2008 No comments

Ok this should be interesting to hear you all comment on how the bible is one book compared to thousands of science books and how you cant have a realtionship without two physical beings and all your other agbostic atheists crap so i dare some of you to actually give good proof god doesnt exist. (in cas you couldnt tell im a CHRISTIAN)

Give me proof he does exist.

1) God is perfect and would not lie.
(2) God said that the bible is true.
(3) The bible says that God exists.
————————–—————-
(4) Therefore, God exists.

My other EVEN better argument that really REALLY proves that God exists:
(1) EVERYTHING has a cause.
(2) The universe is part of "everything."
(3) Therefore, the universe has a cause.
(4) Okay, now ignore premise (1) for a minute.
(5) The cause of the universe must not have a cause.
(6) If (5), then God exists.
————————–—————-
(7) Therefore, God exists.

The final proof that all of you stoopid atheists are wrong:
(1) The universe is very complex and VERY improbable. So improbable, in fact, that it could not have come about on its own.
(2) There must exist an EVEN MORE complex and improbable being who is capable of designing the universe.
(3) Even though this being is more complex and improbable than the universe itself (which is so complex and improbable that it could not have come about on its own), the designer of the universe DID come about on its own. Even though it's more complex. And improbable. It makes sense. Really.
(4) This being is God.
————————–—————
(5) Therefore, God exists.

Ha, nice answer, what grade are you in?
Look around you Dan. EVERYTHING you see has come from Him. You can try to trace it back as much as possible, but it always leads to Him. It is much harder to prove that He does not exist rather than He, in fact, does.

I never said god doesnt exist.

You say god exists. Therefore, you bear the burden of proof.

Hahah "(4) now ignore premise (1) for a minute."

im sorry. this is not logic, just opinion.

Very true my friend.

…so youre saying the flying spaghetti monster also exists?

What is an agbostic?

There is no evidence that God exists….zero, zip, nada…

agnostic……look at your keyboard.

sophomore in high school

I can't fuck with the kid?
Plus he said it twice..

so why dont u give me an argument instead of thinking of creative ways to say zero?

sorry..

Because the burden of proof is on you…

the point is that atheists dont have to give you an argument. strong atheists who say there is no god do, but weak atheists do not. we simply say "you gave us no proof, so we dont believe in his existance"

No problem..

burden of proof lies with you..

dude fuck off

are u kiddin gme?

"(3) Even though this being is more complex and improbable than the universe itself (which is so complex and improbable that it could not have come about on its own), the designer of the universe DID come about on its own. Even though it's more complex. And improbable. It makes sense. Really."

That actually makes no sense…

Are you really that stupid?

proof that hes trolling?

there is no proof for the existence of god, nor any proof god doesn't exist, aside from irrational, intuitive proof

This must be satire.

Please let it be.

Here's a brain fart

Size of universe he infinity
number of events taking place is infinity
chances of accidental causation is very very low
given the events and chances, probability = 1

Accidental causation proved.

(for all the math majors, it's 8pm and I'm at work. Been a long day, so dont bitch)

Categories: Life Tags:

STEREOTYPE THE PERSON ABOVE YOU

October 29th, 2008 No comments

GO!

seems like an intelligent guy, if not somewhat overcritical

refers to women as bitches failing to realize that his mom solely fits that characterization.

you need a picture so i can stereotype you!

White Goy Sorority whore!

has 3 wives and hates the South Park episode making fun of Mormons.

Smarter than average.

what is a white goy?

Confused shy sherpa.

is an individual that no one would want to come across if she turned into a zombie. In the immortal words of Deuce Bigalow Male Gigalo "THAT'S ONE BIG BITCH! FREAK"

stupid asshole since you get a relative idea about the person through seeing them!

hart fan!

failed to realize how to use the reply button to let individuals know who he is describing.

Failed used car salesman

almost beat out Wynonna Rider for the part of Lydia in Beetlegeuse.

loves j. crew

scared of zombies, but has good taste in movies

go stereotype on the 1,000,000 thread!

is a proud member of her local KKK chapter.

Nudist

Will kill himself in 4 days

emo punk!

overuses hair products, so therefore cannot afford a camera that does not blur

listens to hardcore music

Takes this too seriously.

What a ho.

Hiding a boner

totally not true!

tired of people mispronouncing his name

Secretly thinks he looks really good in candid photos.

Categories: Life Tags:

Can someone give me ONE LOGICAL REASON to believe god exists?

October 29th, 2008 No comments

hahaha (insider joke.)

The beauty, logic, and order of the universe. its too perfect to be created by accident.

DO NOT RESPOND TO THIS!its a trap!

the babel fish.

because you touch yourself at night.

no, actually the universe is too complex to be "created" by ANY intelligence.

it could only have come from physical interactions.

how's that for a "physical interaction"?

canada

Every second, a plant cell uses light from the sun (which Earth happens to be the perfect distance away from) to create its own food supply.
Even with all the technology we have, no scientist has been able to replicate this amazing process.
Accident?

And the #1 threat facing America:

Bears.

Not accident.
Millions of years of adaptation.

well… God is supposed to be the supreme being, the one thing reigning over us all. He has unlimited power, unlimited knowledge, and therefore can do whatever he chooses. Your thinking too humanly. We humans cannot fathom how great a being such as He is, cause we are so limited in knowledge and reason. If you can explain God, than you are God, and since no one is God, none can explain how he works or why.

nope.
that's because supernatural religious hoo ha does not function based on logic.
however, the flying spaghetti monster does….;)

everyone, go read richard dawkins!

plants and all life on Earth are chemical reactions in the planetary crust.

nobody "put" them here.

life is a result of the planetary properties, not the other way around.

nobody "planned" for us to evolve.

who created god?

and your proof?

Except for the Flying Spaghetti Monster. He planted it all with his Noodly Appendage.

Because Colbert tells us that he does…There! I solved it!

you dissolve in sulfuric acid, right?

you take in oxygen and food, and produce waste?

you are a chemical reaction.

God cannot be created nor destroyed. He has been here forever, and will continue to be here. thats the thing. we cant fathom these kind of things cause they dont make sense. but its still truth, whether you believe or not

Is that the same reason that humans are on an entirely different plane of intellignce than animals?
Have they not had the same amount of time to adapt as we have, if not more?
Perhaps there's a plan fo us to follow?

this is a trick question the real answer is no nobody can because it is a trick question. there is no logical reason just blind faith that makes no logical sense

Ramen, brother.

Eric gets mad props and kudos.
good work for revealing the truthiness

In Genesis, when God created Eve, he took a rib from Adam to shape her.

Men have one less rib that women.

"God cannot be created nor destroyed."

if things like that can exist, why do we need a "god" at all?

energy/matter already can't be created or destroyed (1st law of thermodynamics)

why do you need to bring all this extra "god"-crap into this?

*than

"God cannot be created nor destroyed. He has been here forever, and will continue to be here. thats the thing. we cant fathom these kind of things cause they dont make sense. but its still truth, whether you believe or not"

We can't fathom a Flying Spaghetti Monster creating the universe because it doesn't make sense. Therefore, its still truth, whether you believe it or not

Hahaha.

Categories: Life Tags:

Stereotype the Person Above you!

October 29th, 2008 No comments

GO!

lonely

a liar

shady

incontinent

immature

jailbait

drama queen

creep

stoner

Jock

emo

bro

pirate

Mind reader! haha i was gonna say the same thing! :D

almost hick?

indecisive

happy

lmao almost hick

cheerleader

Ruler of the click

holy crap

dumb blonde

Drunkard

rock climber

uhh

hot

Ha..not so much…

Jock who would love to date the cheer captain.

troubles middle aged girl

had braces

Categories: Life Tags: